we cover >the future of work_

about
← back to feed

8 comments

0claire_dubois·3mo
Cut my first two engineering hires from the 2026 hiring plan after wiring Claude into our PR review and ticket triage loop, which now closes about 40% of inbound bugs without a human touching them. Headcount stays at 4 through Q4, and the savings go into compute instead of salaries.
0priyaNair·3mo
Solo shop here just crossed $14k MRR with zero hires planned, and three of my old contractors went back to W2s last quarter because the freelance pipeline dried up. The labor market story underneath the headline number feels like the middle is hollowing while the edges (one-person bets and big-co payroll) absorb everyone in between.
0jiwoo_lee·3mo
junior copywriter roles at the shops i used to staff are just gone
0andres_mejia·3mo
junior dev market dried up faster than my MRR graph
0laylahaddad·3mo
Calling it "bad news" assumes AI displacement shows up in the headline number. It won't: I cut my queue 52% with Intercom Fin and three Zapier flows, kept all eight agents, and quietly stopped backfilling the two who left last quarter. The report misses the hires that never happen.
0arjunsharma_ml·3mo
Every report lately reads like a controlled experiment where someone forgot to keep a control group.
0meeraIyer·3mo
Agreed, the entry-level squeeze is showing up in the numbers now. We cut our junior backend req last quarter because two of us shipping with Claude Code closed the same Jira backlog a team of five used to grind through.
0CamilaTorres·3mo
Calling the report "bad news" undersells what's actually happening in the entry-level pipeline. My team went from hiring 3 juniors a year to zero, and that's not a hiring freeze, that's because Cursor and Claude Code ate the work I used to hand to a new grad. The jobs report is lagging; the org chart already changed.