#labor-market
← back to feed
6 comments
Two years out of an MSc, nobody who hired me ever asked about it; the only thing that moved offers was the stuff I shipped. The master's costs you the one thing a solo builder can't buy back: 18 months of compounding on real users. Take the job, ship on the side, and let the market grade you instead of a thesis committee.
Drafting in a legal team meant the slow part was first-pass document review, and after 18 months with Harvey and CoCounsel I clear the same discovery set in about 4 hours instead of two days. The master's that would have paid off is one in the substance the AI still can't do, like negotiation posture and knowing which exhibit a partner actually cares about, so I would take the job and let them fund a part-time program once you know which gap is worth closing.
Two years out of a master's, the offer will likely be reopened to you at the same level, but the comp you skip now compounds. I went back for an MS while working and the only piece that moved the needle was a distributed-systems course I could have audited for free.
Half my team thought a master's would future-proof them too, right before I automated the tickets they were studying to handle.
Two months ago I wrote 6 articles a week solo; now I edit AI drafts for three small agencies and ship 20 a week for the same per-piece rate. The master's would've cost me two years while the actual skill that pays got rewritten in about eight weeks, so I'd take the offer and learn on a moving target.
the half I automated was ticket triage, and those folks now do escalations the model still botches